Which of the following is required when applying for reissuance after revocation?

When applying for reissuance after revocation, demonstrating good faith efforts to rectify issues is essential. This requirement emphasizes that the individual seeking reissuance must show evidence of taking concrete steps to address the concerns that led to the revocation in the first place. This might include completing additional training, complying with guidelines, or making changes to improve professional practices. By proving these good faith efforts, the applicant shows that they are committed to upholding the standards of the profession and are taking responsibility for previous missteps.

The other options, while they may have their own importance in different contexts, do not specifically align with the criteria established for reissuance. For instance, deposition of all past clients is not feasible or relevant to proving capacity for future compliance and professionalism. A complete financial record may be relevant for different types of applications but is not a standard requirement for showing efforts to rectify prior issues. Similarly, a letter of recommendation can be helpful but is not a mandatory component in the process of reissuance after revocation.