An applicant seeking reissuance bears the burden of proving what?

In the context of seeking reissuance of a certification, the applicant is required to demonstrate "good cause." This means that the applicant must provide sufficient evidence or reasoning that justifies why reissuance should be granted. Good cause serves as a standard for evaluating whether the circumstances surrounding the request for reissuance are both compelling and acceptable under the regulatory framework governing shorthand reporters.

Establishing good cause can encompass a variety of factors, such as previous compliance with regulations, mitigating circumstances for any prior issues, and a demonstrated commitment to meeting the requirements of certification moving forward. This standard ensures that applicants are not automatically granted reissuance but rather must actively show that they meet the necessary criteria for continuing their professional licensure.

The other options do not fully address the requirements set forth for reissuance. For example, an applicant may not necessarily need to demonstrate innocence or financial stability, nor is professional experience the primary criterion under which reissuance is evaluated. The focus is on providing a sound rationale for why the individual should be allowed to continue their practice through reissuance of their certification.